If most of the defenders of the Amazigh and those belonging to the Berber movement were welcomed by the decision to normalize Morocco for its relations with Israel, which they were always calling for, this does not mean that the Amazigh benefited from this normalization.The only profit that the Berber earns from this normalization is the profit that the state has the normalization state.And if we know that this state behaves as an “Arab” state, the Amazigh rejects an identity for it as an Amazigh state, and it took the decision to normalize in this “Arab” character, so logical is the Amazigh losing from this process that earned its opponent - the “Arab” state - profit and spoiler.
As for the claim that the activists of the Amazigh movement, and because they are “repeated”, as it is repeated in the Amazigh literature of the Amazighs of the Amazigh, from the Muslim and Matserin, the Arabs who are hostile to Israel, they are so crazy from normalization gains for the Amazigh in accordance with the principle of my friend's enemy enemy, it is the claim of the theory of ready and well -known conspiracy theory.And that is automatically evoked to explain everything related to Berber and Israel.The error in this Amazigh general reasoning, the conspiracies, is that the Amazigh activists, if we accept that they are “hostile” of the Arabs, are not the real Arabs, the Arabs of the Middle East who are in conflict with Israel, but they are the Arabs of falseThat is, Moroccans who are already Amazighs, but they denied their Berbers and turned into "barbarians" for her, that is, foreigners about them according to the original Greek meaning of the word "barbarians" (see the topic: "When the Berbers turn into a barra, they return their Amazighs" on the link).These are the real enemies of the Berber, who work day and night on "Berbera", the remainder of the Amazighs for their Arabization and conversion, like them, to false Arab.As for these real Arabs, they are our friends and partners with them the relations of religion, culture, language and history, we respect their Arab identity as they respect our Amazigh identity.That is why we have no hostility with them because they are not from "Berbrona", raised us, and stigmatized the Amazighs, and fought it as it does "Brabra" Morocco.
Then even on the assumption that Israel will see in supporting the Amazigh movement of the normalization process in support of it as a friend of this movement, as the Berber opponents who are emerging it claiming to link it to Zionism, will Israel respond to this support with similar support in which its influence is used to defend the Amazigh inside and outside Morocco?If someone believes this seriously, then he demonstrates a general and naive understanding of the nature of relations between states and the nature of Israel in particular.
Israel, as a state, does not formally deal at the level of bilateral diplomatic relations, except with countries, and not with part of these countries, such as societies, parties, or political and ideological currents ... Therefore, the decision to establish official relations between Morocco and Israel is a decision issued by the king in the name of the Moroccan state.As its supreme representative according to the constitution, and the cooperation agreement between the two countries signed it, in the presence of the king on December 22, 2020, the second representative of the state, who is Prime Minister, Mr. Saad al -Din al -Othmani.Everything in this relationship between Morocco and Israel was carried out in the name of the Moroccan state and the State of Israel.Yes, there can be, and outside the state framework, cooperation and friendship relations between citizens, associations or parties from Morocco and between them in Israel, as a special civil matter in which the two countries do not interfere, as it was valid when there were no official relations between Morocco and Israel..In this special civil matter, the relations that link Amazigh activists and associations from Morocco to Israeli citizens and Israeli civil society bodies enter into this.
As for the framework of the official relations between the state of Morocco and the State of Israel, there is no presence and there is no place in it for the Amazigh.This is because Israel deals with Morocco, according to its official identity, which is known and in the name of belonging to it, he signed the agreements that link it to Israel.We have seen that the hall in which the cooperation agreement was signed between Morocco and Israel under the supervision of the king, in which there was a prominent painting, which is the "honorable lineage" of the king.This is a strong indication, symbolic, not constitutional, whether it is intended or angry, on the "Arab" affiliation of the state.The thing that requires Israel to deal with Morocco as an Arab country with a complete ignorance of the Berber, otherwise it, if it evokes the Amazigh in this deal, will be involved in the internal affairs of Morocco.That is why he was neither expected nor required by Israel to write the word "peace" in the Amazigh on its plane, which transported its delegation to Morocco, besides writing it in Arabic and Hebrew..
On the other hand, the interest of Israel requires ignoring the Amazigh even if its public bias to this Berber will not be important to Morocco and will not anger it..Why?Because as long as its opponents are from the Arab countries, as much as the Arab countries printed with them abound, as much as this is useful to them, because it shows it as a state of peace and peace, which is what Israel seeks through the Arab normalization process with it..That is why it is in its interest that Morocco be among these printed Arab countries, and not a lexical country, as if it is an Amazigh state.
Moreover, the same interest in Israel makes it prefer Arabism over the Amazigh.For example, if she had to choose between an Arab Maghreb and a Berber Morocco, she would choose the first Morocco.Why?Because it knows the science of certainty, because of its deep knowledge of the Arabs, their nature, their peculiarities, their mentality, divisions and psychology ..., that the presence of the Arabs is what secures, more than any other people, its interests and its superiority.For example, if the Arab countries in the Middle East, which refused the establishment of the State of Israel and calling for erasing and eliminating it, were non -Arab, such as being Turkish, Persian or Afghan ... Was Israel to triumph over that overwhelming victory, and seize its lands and surpass it militarily, scientifically and economically?From here, Israel prefers its enemy to be an Arab, so that it is stronger than it, defeats it in every battle and confrontation.For this reason, it is, for Morocco, prefers to be an Arab, provided that it is Berber.
Here, Israel will behave as France did when Morocco occupied in 1912.She knew, through the intelligence and anthropological reports gathered with it, that Morocco is a Berber country, and that the Amazigh language is used by more than 85% without this means that the minority that uses the dialect of Arab origins.This results in that if it decided and announced that Morocco is a Berber country and dealt with it, as a fierce state, based on its Amazigh affiliation, it would not have met no objection or refusal, because the Amazigh of Morocco on that date was an achievement of the result.However, she chose to deal with him as an Arab country.Rather, it was the one that created for the first time this Arab state in Morocco.Why?Because it knew that an Arab country would protect its interests more than what the Berber country would do.This is what was achieved and confirmed.France's interests today find all the care and protection from the Arab state established by France.An example of this, the French language is still "worshiped" in Morocco, as practically, the real official language, with Arabic enjoying the official attribute in the constitution only.But if France supported the Amazigh Morocco, as it was a fierce state, its Amazigh state, will the French keep its position as a first language dominant in Morocco?The same will be done by Israel, which knows that an Arab country is more guaranteed and protecting its interests than a lexical country.Therefore, if an example, as an illustrative, a dispute between the Berbers of Morocco and its Arabs, that is, the converts who believe that they are Arabs, and Israel had to support a party against another party, then it will certainly support the Arab party to ensure its security and strategic interests..
As for what the Amazighs repeat, from Islamists and Matserin, that Israel uses the Amazigh and Amazigh activists to achieve its goals and ensure its interests, it is a chant of that ready and well -known conspiracy theory, which obscures their eyesight and insight into the realization of the fact that those who use Israel to achieve its goals and ensure their interests are as they have already indicated, as they have already been shownThe Arabs themselves, thanks to which they have reached the progress, superiority and majority they reached.Consequently, it does not need Amazigh or Berber, to bet on something that remains its usefulness is not guaranteed, and leaves what its benefit and its efficacy in a certainty and definite way, which is the service provided by the Arabism and its Arab owners offered to it.
As for measuring the state of the Berbers on the status of the Kurds of clearance, as the Berber and some Amazigh activists do, that Israel will support the Berbers as it always supported the Kurds, it is a corrupt measure that leads to corrupt results.
If Israel supports the Kurds of Iraq, then this is in order to divide and weaken those who considered it an enemy, which is Iraq.Also, what was facilitating its support for the Kurds is that they have dirt and Sunni borders that allow them to demand separation from the Arab state of Iraq.In Morocco, where are the dirt and Sunni borders that separate the Arabs and the Berbers who demand secession from these Arabs and their Arab state?The Amazighs, unlike the Kurds of Iraq, are located in all regions of Morocco, just as there are also in the same regions, those who consider themselves Arabs.The only region in which the Berbers are located in Morocco are the permission of all of Morocco and all its regions.That is why it is unreasonable to ask the Berbers from Israel, nor to accept, to support them to separate from themselves, that is, from their Amazigh areas that are their Amazigh Maghreb.
But although normalization does not bring a direct benefit to the Berber, as I explained, this does not mean that those who were calling for this normalization from the Amazigh movement activists were wrong or working against the interest of the Amazigh.It is sufficient that this normalization will negatively affect, in one way or another, to use the Palestinian issue as a tool - within other tools - for the identity of the Moroccans (see the topic: “The Arabization Job for Palestine in Morocco” by pressing here) and consolidating their conviction that they are boycotting Israel in solidarity with the Palestinians as “siblings For them, which makes the Palestinian issue also the issue of Moroccans; (Normalization) will become the charge of “Al -Tashain”, which was almost a registered “brand” specifically for the demonization of the Berber and its blackmail, as well as the share of the Moroccan state as well as its “Justice and Development” party, which signed its Secretary -General, as Prime Minister, the peace agreement with Israel, (so that) is sufficient) For normalization to be useful for Berber, even if outside what is direct political regarding the intervention of the two countries concerned with normalization, Morocco and Israel.He stopped blackmail and its use in the name of the Palestinian issue is useful for the Berber as it is beneficial to the Moroccan state.This makes this country regain its sovereignty in making its decisions based on its national interests, and not because of this relationship to the issues of the Middle East and the Arab -Israeli conflict.This is a useful thing for Berber.That is why the Amazigh movement has always called on Morocco to liberate from the problems of the Middle East, or deal with it, if its interest required this, as foreign problems belonging to its foreign owners who are the Arabs of the Middle East.
We want the previous clarifications to show that the betting of the Amazigh defenders on what is external, such as human rights organizations and foreign sympathetic states, as a pressure factor on Morocco to advance the Amazigh and re -consideration of it, will not lead, at best, except to support the "new barbaric policy", which the state has begun inIts approach is at the beginning of the third millennium, especially after the establishment of the Royal Institute for Amazigh Culture, which is the distinction of the "New Berber Policy" Foundation (see the topic: "The failure of the new barbaric policy" within the book: "The Burberry Dahir: Fact or Legend?").It must be recognized that Morocco has succeeded in the external marketing of this "new barbaric policy" by presenting it as a response from the state to the linguistic and ethnic demands of the "barbarian minority", even if it is no longer used today in its speeches and official documents the phrase "barbarian minority".What helped him to this success is the nature of the demands directed by the Amazigh movement to the state as an "Arab" state, demanding it to recognize the rights of the Amazighs, which makes these people, whether or not the Amazigh movement, "a minority" demands its ethnic and ethnic rights.This situation is what Morocco succeeded in managing by approving the "new barbaric policy" as a suitable solution to the nature of the Amazigh demands.In front of the same situation, what may do foreign organizations or countries that are supposed to be sympathetic to the Amazigh?Who are the Moroccan Amazighs who will pressure these organizations and countries on Morocco in order to recognize their rights?And who are the Moroccan Arabs who may denounce these organizations and countries with their mixture of these rights?
This shows that the Amazigh issue has nothing to do with issues that may appear on the surface only similar to it, such as the issue of the Kurds, the Basque, the Katlan or the original peoples ...?What makes the Amazigh issue different from such issues, is that the opponents of the Amazigh are not foreigners from the Berbers, as in those issues that we referred to, but they themselves are Berber, but they are sexually transformed from their original real Amazigh gender to a fake and permissible Arab sex.The solution, in this case, is not that the “Arab” state recognizes the rights of the Amazighs, but rather that it recognizes its Amazigh as an Amazigh state in its collective identity.This is what the demands of the Amazigh movement should be installed in order to move from the cultural level of its demands to the political level, considering the Amazigh issue a political issue, because the state exercises its political authority in the name of the Arab affiliation, which results in a political exclusion of the Berber (see the topic: “In the political exclusion of the Amazigh” withinThe book “In the Amazigh and the Amazighism”) before it was linguistic and cultural exclusion.That is why the foreign organizations and states sympathetic to the Amazigh cannot demand Morocco, and for the benefit of the Amazigh, as the Berber movement does not require the support of these organizations and countries..